全泳装是一个可怕的错误吗? [英语][Skills NT]

对一名游泳运动员的庆祝是最后的挑衅。 虽然官方的决定来得较晚,但我们知道,这次庆祝活动导致禁止在游泳时穿超级套装。 00:00 – 技术服禁令的原因 00:10 – ADIDAS 和 Ian Thorpe 革命的开始 00:47 – NASA 和 LZR 01:08 – 2008 年北京奥运会 01:57 – 2009 年罗马游泳世界杯02:09 – Jaked、沙子和聚氨酯套装 02:40 – 罗马的 100 蝴蝶。 Cavic vs Phelps 04:00 – 庆祝和变化 我们的旱地频道:游泳营:加入我们的 Discord(游泳社区):如果你喜欢游泳,你会喜欢我们的网页:Tik tok:我们最喜欢的亚马逊产品:Instragram:脸书:感谢收看! 游得快! 资料来源:男子 100 米蝴蝶决赛米洛拉德卡维奇 vs 迈克尔菲尔普斯!! 2009年罗马世界游泳锦标赛阿迪达斯赛跑印章第1部分伊恩·索普-阿迪达斯男子200米自由泳决赛2009年罗马世界游泳锦标赛纺织材料。 呼吸空气,不能将其困在里面。 伊恩索普 – 阿迪达斯商业鳍游泳。 西装没有规定。 全聚氨酯。 科技套装简史 Pixel Perfect 制作的超级套装皮克斯图标来自 www.flaticon.com”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4n1s47GWhmI

关于 Skills N' Talents

Avatar photo
We are two brothers who swam for 30 years in the competitive arena (15 years each) and we hope we can transmit our knowledge as clearly and simple as youtube allows us to.

30 留言

  1. These speed suits are no different than gloves in the NFL that give an athlete an advantage.

  2. It was much more fun with complete suits.

  3. Shouldnt NASA be working on perfecting rocket launch takeoffs, since those are much more devastating when they go wrong? Seems like their focus is a bit off here.

  4. Personally, I like to swim is a pair of trunks with pockets in them. I get more of a workout than anyone in any of these fancy suits.

  5. Phelps was mad when he lost to a super suit. However, when he won WITH a super suit at 2008 he didn’t complain. That’s really unfair.
    He’s a great swimmer but some of his records seem tainted to me

  6. Why are you making a monster out of Cavic? Totally ridiculous. What you say about him applies equally to Phelps. I remember when all US swimmers showed up with the cupping marks on their shoulders and no one asked why…just because Cavic represents a small, insignificant country to you does not mean he is a monster and he made his achievements inappropriately. Totally ridiculous insinuations. More so that every one in those days had those suits. Unsubscribe from me!

  7. Running having the same problem now

  8. Theres a big difference between making it better and making it unfair.
    Not sure if Phelps proved a point cause hes one in a million, but makes me wonder : would Ian Thorpe beat him in that final (2004) if wasnt for the suit?

  9. Tech suits died because Phelpls was jealous.

  10. The suits were a mistake, yes… and banning them was also a mistake.

  11. The suits were so unfair, especially to poorer athletes like Phelps who couldn't afford them.

  12. Honeeyyy… where's my SUPERSUIT??

  13. I'm left confused. So why did they ban the suits? This video built up to this final matchdown, but I don't see what happened there that would get the suits burnt.

  14. Disasterous clip. Presenting Čavić like a super villain from a low budget sf movie

  15. Money and greed… u mean everything American?…

  16. So much hate for the tech suits, yet Nobody speaks of the amazing advancement in technology. Sports like war is one of the few places where it is profitable to develop new tech.
    However sports is far more pleasant a catalyst for tech development.
    F1 and stock car racing lead the world in development of the motor car in every aspect from speed handling to safety. Sailing also has never stagnated from developments in technology the thought of running Americas cup in a single hull boat today would be mad. All of these technologies often find applications outside of original purpose and benefit all humanity. Banning the tech robs the world of advancements to our civilisation.

  17. Comparing the suit Thorpe wore in 2004 to the suits from 2008 and 2009 is like comparing a car from 1934 to a (non hybrid) 2021 car. Yes, technically both are motor vehicles with an internal combustion engine but one is clearly more advanced than the other.

    Thorpe's suit didn't compress the body anywhere near as efficiently. It didn't have anywhere near the efficient use of polyurethane panels over high drag body areas like in the Speedo LZR or be a pure polyurethane suit like the Arena suits. Nor did it contain technology like increasing blood flow to muscles or trapping water for buoyancy.

    And in 1999 when Thorpe broke all those world records he wasn't wearing a suit.

    Fact is other swimmers from the 2000 to 2004 could have worn suits like that if they wanted to but they chose not to.

  18. Phelps didn’t mind when he was winning using these things. Hypocrite

  19. I am so confused. I don't think you answered the question at all

  20. hoNEEEY? Where is my super suit?

  21. I was so glad they banned them

  22. And this is exactly what’s going on with supershoes right now, yet the WAF just kinda threw up their hands and said, “Oh well, wear them.”

  23. Imagine Dressel with the super suit

  24. The same problem is currently happening in athletics with the new shoes. They are so much better than the ones even just 20 years ago.

  25. First, the supersuits broke the records.
    Now, doping does the job.
    Sad.

  26. Absolutely. They should have never been introduced to the races.

  27. Lack of logic in the final argument. If “everything changed” after the swimmer's victory over the suit, why ban it?

发表评论

您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。